Ask an Advisor: I Inherited $200k in an IRA, but I’m in the 35% Tax Bracket-What’s the Best Way to Withdraw

Date:

Financial advisor and columnist Brandon Renfro

SmartAsset and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below.

I was left $200,000 in an IRA Beneficiary Distribution Account (BDA) when my father passed. I have 10 years to withdraw this money. I’m at the 35% federal tax rate currently and plan to make a similar annual income over the next 10 years. Taking the money out in one lump sum would not change my federal tax rate but neither would taking it out over 10 years. Is there a benefit to keeping this money in the IRA vs. withdrawing now, paying the taxes and then using it to invest in other financial instruments?

– Brad

At first blush, it may seem like the answer would be to withdraw it all now. The logic is that it would be better to have the compound growth occur in an environment in which the long-term capital gains tax rate would apply instead of ordinary income taxes. This is often the case when you expect your marginal tax rate to change. I don’t think this applies in your case since you anticipate being in the 35% tax bracket going forward.

Leaving the money invested in the IRA, on the other hand, can reduce tax drag and potentially leave you with more money at the end of 10 years. But like so much in financial planning, the answer to your question may depend on whether tax laws change in the future. (And if you need more help exploring questions like this one, consider working with a financial advisor.)

A man considers how to structure the withdrawals from an IRA he inherited.
A man considers how to structure the withdrawals from an IRA he inherited.

To evaluate the two approaches, we’ll want to compare the after-tax value of the $200,000 at the end of 10 years in both scenarios. We can do this by comparing the extreme ends: withdrawing it all now or all of it at the end of 10 years. If either outcome is better – and we hold the same assumptions (return, taxes) constant over the 10-year periods – a variation of either option would produce a similar result, just to a lesser degree.

A range of withdrawal options may be available to you depending on whether or not your dad had already begun taking required minimum distributions (RMDs). If he had, be mindful that you are likely subject to an annual RMD requirement as well unless you meet one of the exceptions.

So, let’s get started.

First, we need to understand how much you would have to invest in each scenario. If you withdraw $200,000 and 35% goes to taxes, you’re left with $130,000 to reinvest. Of course, if you just leave it in the inherited IRA, all $200,000 remains invested.

Next, we need to project how much the money is expected to grow over the next 10 years. We can pick any random annual return to use as long as we use the same for each. I picked 10% simply because it’s a round number.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

With addition of Kyle Tucker, Chicago Cubs are instantly better — but for just one year

The winter meetings are over, Juan Soto is a...

PGA Tour vet Scott Stallings is caddying at Q-School

PONTE VEDRA BEACH, Fla. – Scott Stallings is carrying...