Why Ken Fisher Says ‘Capital Preservation’ Could Cost You Big In Retirement

Date:

Why Ken Fisher Says ‘Capital Preservation’ Could Cost You Big In Retirement

Legendary investor Ken Fisher has a message for retirees and those planning for retirement – the allure of “capital preservation” might be setting you up for financial disappointment.

Fisher, known for his no-nonsense approach to investing, argued in a New York Post opinion report issued on Monday that the concept of capital preservation – often touted as a haven for retirement savings – is fundamentally at odds with the growth needed to sustain a comfortable retirement.

Don’t Miss:

“Growth and true capital preservation can’t coexist in the short run,” Fisher explained. He said that what many consider “safe” investing strategies often fail to keep pace with inflation, potentially eroding purchasing power over time.

The center of Fisher’s argument lies in the role of market volatility. While many investors view volatility as a threat, Fisher sees it as essential for long-term growth. He said that historically, U.S. stocks have risen in 63.1% of calendar months and 73.5% of calendar years from 1925 to 2023.

Trending: Will the surge continue or decline on real estate prices? People are finding out about risk-free real estate investing that lets you cash out whenever you want.

“Eliminate the [downside] and the [upside] also disappears,” Fisher said. He argues that attempts to completely avoid market fluctuations typically result in ultralow returns, barely outpacing – or even trailing behind – inflation.

The investor aimed at financial products promising growth and capital preservation, calling them “phony.”

“Investment strategies promising both growth and capital preservation are phony baloney,” Fisher opined. “Yet so many vendors in varied forms – especially in rocky times like this summer’s – claim otherwise, peddling poor products destined to disappoint.

Trending: Founder of Personal Capital and ex-CEO of PayPal re-engineers traditional banking with this new high-yield account — start saving better today.

He warns investors to be particularly wary of insurance-like “buffered” funds and any product claiming “upside with no downside.”

Instead, the investor is advocating for a clear-eyed approach to retirement investing. He urges investors to understand that short-term volatility is the price of admission for long-term growth. For those who can’t stomach market ups and downs, he suggests reevaluating financial goals, savings rates and future spending plans.

See Also: These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends

The veteran investor’s advice comes when many retirees grapple with economic uncertainty and market turbulence. While the desire for stability is understandable, Fisher’s message is clear – playing it too safe could cost you big in the long run.

As retirement horizons lengthen and the cost of living continues to rise, Fisher’s perspective offers the insight that there are no guarantees and that pursuing growth often requires embracing, rather than avoiding, market volatility.

Read Next:

Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge’s one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today’s competitive market.

Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?

This article Why Ken Fisher Says ‘Capital Preservation’ Could Cost You Big In Retirement originally appeared on Benzinga.com

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Joe Burrow throws remarkable TD pass to Tee Higgins while falling horizontal to his knees

Joe Burrow entered Sunday with a career-high 36 touchdown...

College Football Playoff Round 1 Overreaction: home field advantage wins the weekend

This embedded content is not available in your region.Whelp,...

Breer: Potential offensive coordinator candidates if Patriots make change

Breer: Potential offensive coordinator candidates if Patriots make change...